Giles ,'Conversations with Dead People'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Unfortunately, Brenda, there are far too many out there just like this. I bet you still have yours.
He apologized for being unclear when he first gave me the assignment, but damn. As I'm forever telling Kara, sometimes an apology just isn't enough.
Okay, back to it. Thanks for letting me vent.
That's what we're here for, Deena.
OK, I figure I'm about to reveal just how very vanilla I am, but what exactly was Jon Stewart implying with all the talk about a "reach-around" on TDS last night?
That's a bad client, Deena. He should be charged an Aggravation Fee.
yep.Stupid Client tax. Vw, is that the paper on the internets?
Think of one guy behind another guy. Penetration is involved. Then the guy behind (who is the one getting all the action, if you catch my drift) reaches around the guy in front to get him off as well. It's good manners.
He should be charged an Aggravation Fee
I so do this! I quote out fees for custom reports and when appropriate, I tack on a pain in the butt fee. It's not line-itemed out, of course, but it makes me happy to charge people who are pains extra money.
Brenda has a new tag.
That's awesome, ChiKat!
Vw, is that the paper on the internets?
Yup. It is. Should be done in a couple weeks. Yay!
Aha. Got it.
(I really am vanilla, huh?)