It's okay. There's a way around this. The stomper works fine. It's the alignment of labels to be printed that are an ish.
sigh.
Mal: Then I call it a win. What's the problem? Inara: Should I start with the part where you're stranded in the middle of nowhere, or the part where you have no clothes?
'Trash'
Natter 32 Flavors and Then Some
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Kat - Feb 10, 2005 2:41:06 pm PST #6005 of 10002
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
§ ita § - Feb 10, 2005 2:41:21 pm PST #6006 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Jury duty needs better compensation, as far as I can tell. Who can afford to get picked, for instance, for the Michael Jackson jury?
I can't see how it wouldn't bankrupt the courts, but still. It seems weird.
aurelia - Feb 10, 2005 2:42:17 pm PST #6007 of 10002
All sorrows can be borne if you put them into a story. Tell me a story.
that's awful, but also fascinating that real cities-that-have-trains are so efficient at getting back on-line after such things
Sadly, I think CTA has some experience in this sort of thing. Of course the elevated tracks keep other vehicles out of the way on most of the lines, so there isn't the danger of derailment.
Jesse - Feb 10, 2005 2:42:43 pm PST #6008 of 10002
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
You're not supposed to lose salary for jury duty, I thought?
Jesse - Feb 10, 2005 2:43:18 pm PST #6009 of 10002
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
I wish my dinner would get here.
Kat - Feb 10, 2005 2:43:19 pm PST #6010 of 10002
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
Jury duty needs better compensation,
Professional jurors.
§ ita § - Feb 10, 2005 2:44:53 pm PST #6011 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
You're not supposed to lose salary for jury duty, I thought?
My company "will not compensate employees for such time off, unless required by law."
For some reason, I'd thought it wasn't. At least not here.
Am I wrong?
Jesse - Feb 10, 2005 2:47:40 pm PST #6012 of 10002
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
For some reason, I'd thought it wasn't. At least not here.
Am I wrong?
I have no idea. I only have a vague notion of the laws in the places I've actually lived! Because of course it would be state law, wouldn't it?
§ ita § - Feb 10, 2005 2:51:14 pm PST #6013 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I found the California page: "State law does not require employers to compensate employees who are absent because of jury service."
lori - Feb 10, 2005 2:52:51 pm PST #6014 of 10002
We get paid time off for up to 10 jury duty days per year. But if the service will last longer than 10 days, I think it's possible to get approval to charge up to 20 days.
And we get to keep the $8 or whatever the court pays. Whoo.