River: You gave up everything you had. Simon: [Chinese] Everything I have is right here.

'Safe'


Firefly 4: Also, we can kill you with our brains  

Discussion of the Mutant Enemy series, Firefly, the ensuing movie Serenity, and other projects in that universe. Like the other show threads, anything broadcast in the US is fine; spoilers are verboten and will be deleted if found.


Kevin - Oct 20, 2005 1:20:26 pm PDT #6689 of 10001
Never fall in love with somebody you actually love.

Well, I view every single person here (including myself) as part of that fandom. Of course, people here can generally spell, however.


brenda m - Oct 20, 2005 1:21:04 pm PDT #6690 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

two, assuming that noting relevant details to properly evaluate the movie can *only* be done by "loyal browncoats"

To be fair, I think it's saying that this *will* only be done by them, not that it *can* only. But I'm pretty much with you on the rest of it. It doesn't really annoy so much as make me cringe a little, though.


shrift - Oct 20, 2005 1:22:38 pm PDT #6691 of 10001
"You can't put a price on the joy of not giving a shit." -Zenkitty

So I should stop calling shrift "shrift"?

That would be odd. Although if you want to square quote me all next weekend, I'll laugh.

Shrift's real name is shrift, and I don't care what her driver's license says.

It says I'm F and 5'4" and have brown eyes that need corrective lenses. All true!

That statement isn't pretentious, I think, it's just fandomly.

Making excessive claims of value isn't unusual to fandom. Or anywhere else, really. I've certainly done it myself. Sometimes it rubs me wrong, like a fannish call to arms that sounds like poetry I wrote when I was 15 and convinced nobody understood my secret pain.

Yeah, like that.


§ ita § - Oct 20, 2005 1:22:45 pm PDT #6692 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

It's the sort of sentence that defeats itself as it's spoken.


Steph L. - Oct 20, 2005 1:26:40 pm PDT #6693 of 10001
I look more rad than Lutheranism

Allyson, it was somebody here who suggested it should be put in front of JW's nose.

That was me, last night, and (I went back and checked my post) I said "Joss needs to see this," in the sense that, if someone raves about your work, *really* gets it, it would be nice for them to know.

I didn't mean Whedonesque it, or e-mail it to Joss, or anything specific. Otherwise, I would have said so, in specific terms.

(And even if I had said so, in specific terms, I don't speak for Nilly or this board or Shrift and her bandwidth.)


Kevin - Oct 20, 2005 1:32:01 pm PDT #6694 of 10001
Never fall in love with somebody you actually love.

I don't think linking something from Whedonesque is in any way dodgy. Traffic wise, it'll be a few hundred hits. People there enjoyed the review. Apparently we're the people wanking about the quote marks and other peoples phrasing of love for something (aka fandom).


Monique - Oct 20, 2005 1:35:01 pm PDT #6695 of 10001

Traffic wise, it'll be a few hundred hits.

Actually, I get thousands anytime Whedonesque links to anything on my site.

People there probably didn't focus on the quote marks, because Nilly is a Buffista. I think it makes sense that Buffistas comment on it. Others don't know her. Buffistas do.


§ ita § - Oct 20, 2005 1:36:22 pm PDT #6696 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I don't think linking something from Whedonesque is in any way dodgy

It's jacked with our usage levels -- that's why we're usually cited indirectly.


Kevin - Oct 20, 2005 1:39:15 pm PDT #6697 of 10001
Never fall in love with somebody you actually love.

CantStopTheSignal.co.uk is running at 9000 hits from Whedonesque this month, but that was a link for the DVD information.. It really depends on the potential interest for a story, I doubt it'll be much traffic in this case (not meaning to dismiss the quality of the work because I think Nillys review is excellent - it deserved being read by people, but there have been many reviews).


Dana - Oct 20, 2005 1:41:47 pm PDT #6698 of 10001
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.

Yes, but regardless of what you think about how much traffic it will get (and you certainly have more experience with that than I do, since I have...none), shrift is a Buffista, and shriftweb is her site, and there's a lot of stuff for Buffistas and the fandom at large on that site. It just would have been nice to ask.