Yeah, is there anyone still here who hasn't seen Serenity yet?

Me. I'm thoroughly spoiled though, and don't care to have it any other way.

It read to me like he was discussing the phenomenon. To be honest, the first movie wasn't even that good. I mean, I liked it, but it never cried out to me to rewatch it.

OK, you know the idea that the "can't stop the signal" is a big Fuck You to Fox?

"Serenity Now!: Whedon Flips Off Fox in Clever Space-Western"

Kevin "Firefly Spoilers" Sep 27, 2005 2:29:16 pm PDT

It read to me like he was discussing the phenomenon. To be honest, the first movie wasn't even that good. I mean, I liked it, but it never cried out to me to rewatch it.

I love the original, though I realize it hasn't aged as gracefully as it could, and still re-watch it from time to time. I think, once they found their stride, the TV series was better, but the original movie is still a lot of fun and does a good job with the mythos and humor and how it does the transitions between the present and the flashbacks.

The TV series will always have a place in my 17-year-old heart, but my 25-year-old mind has trouble getting over how godawfully formulaic it got. That's where the Firefly comparison really breaks down (or had better, because if it turns out to be prophetic, I don't want another series).

IMDB liked it enough to cull from the positives:

In her review, Manohla Dargis in the New York Times compares Joss Whedon's Serenity with George Lucas's Star Wars: Episode III -- Revenge of the Sith. Serenity comes out ahead. "Scene for scene," she writes, "Serenity is more engaging and certainly better written and acted than any of Mr. Lucas's recent screen entertainments. Mr. Whedon isn't aiming to conquer the pop-culture universe with a branded mythology; he just wants us to hitch a ride to a galaxy far, far away and have a good time." Jan Stuart in Newsday makes a similar comparison, remarking: "George Lucas could learn a thing or two from Whedon. Serenity flies with sass and spirit, qualities that have been in palpably short supply in that Star Wars series since, well, Star Wars." Roger Ebert in the Chicago Sun-Times also indicates that he had a good time watching the movie, writing: "Serenity is made of dubious but energetic special effects, breathless velocity, much imagination, some sly verbal wit and a little political satire." Elizabeth Weitzman in the New York Daily News notes that the movie appears to exist as a the final episode of Whedon's canceled Firefly TV series and because the show's fans "made the Firefly DVD set an unexpected best seller." She adds: "Whedon's sci-fi fantasies smartly parallel the serious issues we're grappling with here on Earth, while his protagonists remain mordantly funny in the face of utter disaster. Like Star Trek before it, the outer-space setting is perfectly suited to a big budget" movie.

I was into the series more for the characters than the storylines. I liked MacLeod and Dawson, and I loved Amanda and Methos. (And was filled with rage at what they did with Amanda in that crap spin-off The Raven and still don't understand why they didn't do the Methos Chronicles or even an anthology series instead.)

Consider the alternative - it was either Amanda or the chick played by Scoggins. No men considered.

I didn't even like Amanda on the main show. I just watched for the beefcake.

I know we'er all black font all the time now, but still just to be kind to those who won't be seeing it until later today or whatever.....

This movie easily had the HSest HSQ I think I've ever seen.