ARGH! My eyes!
That picture should be stored in the Vatican vault, along with other things Not To Be Seen by Man.
Willow: Yikes. Imagine the things...Buffy: No! Stop imagining! All of you! Xander: Already got the visual.
'Dirty Girls'
Natter 31 But Looks 29
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Strix - Jan 18, 2005 1:51:09 pm PST #7715 of 10002
A dress should be tight enough to show you're a woman but loose enough to flee from zombies. — Ginger
Sheryl - Jan 18, 2005 1:51:56 pm PST #7716 of 10002
Fandom means never having to say "But where would I wear that?"
Still, Chloe S's "high-waisted" jeans came to just below her navel. That's not high-waisted in my book.
(She did need to wash her hair and stop scowling, though)
Cashmere - Jan 18, 2005 1:55:04 pm PST #7717 of 10002
Now tagless for your comfort.
That picture should be stored in the Vatican vault, along with other things Not To Be Seen by Man.
I'm browsing Celebrity Toes and cracking up at the commentary. Page 4 features Prince. Hi-larious.
Jesse - Jan 18, 2005 2:01:03 pm PST #7718 of 10002
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
I have mixed feelings about the dress/jeans thing. I kind of don't get it, but still kind of like it. I don't think I could pull it off myself, even though this woman who has sold me dresses in the past seemed to think I could. She was always telling me I could wear stuff over jeans.
I just went grocery shopping, and not only did I forget to buy eggs, a key staple, I bought a jar of peanuts that turned out to be unsalted. BAH.
Jesse - Jan 18, 2005 2:01:48 pm PST #7719 of 10002
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Oh, and has anyone drawn a connection between the anti-camel toe and the anti-visible nipple trends? I think they are the same thing.
Strix - Jan 18, 2005 2:03:00 pm PST #7720 of 10002
A dress should be tight enough to show you're a woman but loose enough to flee from zombies. — Ginger
I have to wear sleek stuff. My body is ruffled enough. A dress with jeans on me would look like I'm trying to smuggle baby hippopatami.
Betsy HP - Jan 18, 2005 2:07:09 pm PST #7721 of 10002
If I only had a brain...
I think they are the same thing.
I think you're right. So why aren't we all focused on guys' crotches at press events, checking to see if they're discreetly smooth?
Sue - Jan 18, 2005 2:11:21 pm PST #7722 of 10002
hip deep in pie
I remember camel toe being a no-no in the late 70's. Sure I was young bu tI had older siblings.
I've seen women at school in all kind of strange outfits. A lot of dressy top + yoga/sweatpants + heels. It's a strange thing. I blame J-lo.
My former artschool roommates were doing the pants under skirt things in the mid-nineties. They were also wearing legwarmers, an abomination against humanity.
Jesse - Jan 18, 2005 2:14:41 pm PST #7723 of 10002
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
So why aren't we all focused on guys' crotches at press events, checking to see if they're discreetly smooth?
You aren't? Huh.
I remember camel toe being a no-no in the late 70's.
In the era of the peek-a-boo bra? Huh.
Sue - Jan 18, 2005 2:21:02 pm PST #7724 of 10002
hip deep in pie
In the era of the peek-a-boo bra? Huh.
IIRC, (and I was only in elementary school) the trick was to have the jeans tight, but no so tight as to have camel toe.
(I wasn't trying to achieve the look, but my sisters were in their teens at the time. And they loved to take me shopping.)