Sue! How can you love the flower? Say it ain't so!
Brenda, I haven't seen one, but it did make me smile.
The whole earth may be sucked into Hell, and you want my help 'cause your girlfriend's a big ho?
Buffy ,'Chosen'
Natter 31 But Looks 29
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
§ ita § - Jan 17, 2005 5:41:04 am PST #7106 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Topic!Cindy - Jan 17, 2005 5:41:39 am PST #7107 of 10002
What is even happening?
brenda, I think she has, or nearly so.
Cate Blanchett's dress could have worked for me, like La Garner's, it was the ornamentation that ruined it for me.
I still think Cate Blanchett should narrate The Bible, for one of those books-on-tape deals.
Sue - Jan 17, 2005 5:42:31 am PST #7108 of 10002
hip deep in pie
So, in my not very scientific census of staff in the building. I had just under 4 dozen cookies this morning and I went around and found every person on this floor and gave them a cookie. Some had two. I have 18 cookies left. So there are less than 30 people here out of probably 150-200.
Sophia Brooks - Jan 17, 2005 5:43:44 am PST #7109 of 10002
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here
Raquel Welch and Meryl Streep should not have the best looking breasts at the GG's. Whyfor does no one wear supportive undergraments?
§ ita § - Jan 17, 2005 5:44:43 am PST #7110 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Whyfor does no one wear supportive undergraments?
There were a lot of nipples. Maybe an amnesty was declared.
Sue - Jan 17, 2005 5:45:32 am PST #7111 of 10002
hip deep in pie
Sue! How can you love the flower? Say it ain't so!
Okay, I didn't love the flowers that much, but I loved the dress on Cate. I liked the way it was cut to her body, yet had those flowy train and sleeves. I loved the colour on her too.
I thought she looked classy and beautiful.
Topic!Cindy - Jan 17, 2005 5:46:41 am PST #7112 of 10002
What is even happening?
I loved the color (on her, I don't think I could wear that color, but wish I could) too, Sue. If it didn't have the rosette--actually the two big rosettes (one on her bust, one on her hip), I would be standing right next to you.
Topic!Cindy - Jan 17, 2005 5:49:24 am PST #7113 of 10002
What is even happening?
I am totally with Sophia on the need for good undergarments. I also think a lot of these dresses should have been lined/more sufficiently lined. I think I could see Cate's navel. I still want to know more about Mariska's dress. Even if I chalk up her marvelous, bulge-less lines to undergarments, I don't understand how the gown could be completely uncreased. I wonder if that was some sort of satin-something else blend.
§ ita § - Jan 17, 2005 5:50:16 am PST #7114 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I can't get past one of her [edit: Cate's] breasts looking like a triffid. Nice colour, and much of the cut (the matching hip triffid is also not my friend). I found JG's extra foof easier to get past.
Sophia Brooks - Jan 17, 2005 5:52:20 am PST #7115 of 10002
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here
I think mariska's dress might have been a stratch satin. Also, they probably have people with steamers stream them after they get out of the limo and before walking down the carpet
I am not sure mariska was wearing undergarments, as the had a lot of nipple show through.