These are the sorts of emails I receive at work:
FYI -- there's a new PRL which has a remarkably simple value for the fundamental quantum limit for time measurement. It's just
(here's a random equasion that looks like sandscrit)
where t is the time to be measured and t_p is the Planck time. Taking t_p to be 10^-43 s predicts a fundamental variation of
2x10^-29 s for a 1 s measurement. We're half way there!
And thank goodness! Because I was just worrying about the fundamental quantum limit for time measurement!
I want to work somewhere where I'm the smartest person in the building.
I want to work somewhere where I'm the smartest person in the building.
Rumsfeld may have to go...
I want to work somewhere where I'm the smartest person in the building.
Me, too, but I don't really feel like forming a one-person corporation.
sluttttt.
edit: whee!!! Thread number.
And now that that is out of my system, nice new thread. Mmmm, shiny.
sluttttt.
31 doesn't seem very slutty. Are you still on drugs?
Cindy got my *actual* age.
31 doesn't seem very slutty. Are you still on drugs?
The way I plan to go through 31? It will be hella slutty. And saucy.
Yup. 1/2 Perc every 6 hours. Whee!!! At this point, it's more about stepping down the dosage than it is pain control, but the pain is still there, is very queer, and doesn't want any more bears.
I may have had too many cookies today. I'm a little random.
Cindy got my *actual* age.
Well, you're still both younger than me. On the other hand, I have a cookie.
eta: cookie xpost
