I'll take everything that's been suggested and try to work it into the rotation.
ND, you're swell. Seriously. This group is big, with eclectic, far-ranging tastes, and you've managed to keep us happy at every F2F so far.
Buffy ,'Showtime'
Plan what to do, what to wear (you can never go wrong with a corset), and get ready for the next BuffistaCon: San Francisco, May 19-21, 2006! Everything else, go here! Swag!
I'll take everything that's been suggested and try to work it into the rotation.
ND, you're swell. Seriously. This group is big, with eclectic, far-ranging tastes, and you've managed to keep us happy at every F2F so far.
ND, perfect.
Like I said, e me - or Nic, or Matt - with the PA req, and we'll put the needed system together for you. We can do a soundcheck long enough in advance to tweak it.
deb insent
Got it, bebe, and just replied so that I could get Nic into the email stream. That's his work addy, though, and he's presently sitting at his home computer, so he won't get back to you until later, because he can't access his work mail from here.
Bottom line? No problem.
DAYUM.
That is one honkin' pretty graphic, there.
Holy crap, Pete. That art is friggin' GORGEOUS.
packs Sharpie marker
I'm having mine SIGNED.
packs Sharpie marker
I'm having mine SIGNED.
Bwah-ha-ha-ha!
Holy crap, Pete. That art is friggin' GORGEOUS.
Not bad for thirty minutes of painting, eh? I'd tell you how I did it but THEN I'D HAVE TO KILL YOU. Or not, your choice.
I'm having mine SIGNED.
Oh blimey.
Anyway, a quick question - a request for fresh eyes, really. The point on the right of the image, at the level of the bridge, where the strokes get smaller, is anyone bothered by those smaller strokes? Do they seem cluttered and would benefit from the same clean sweeping effect that the rest of the image has? Anyone? Bueller?