Dawn ,'Never Leave Me'
Plan what to do, what to wear (you can never go wrong with a corset), and get ready for the next BuffistaCon: San Francisco, May 19-21, 2006! Everything else, go here! Swag!
Ok, so, how about, for each city:
With the last one being our first line of decision.
My sense of symmetry is bothered by there being one positive choice and three neutral to negative ones -- but you'll be the one doing the arithmetic in the end. Is the scale of one to four too dry and abstract?
Too abstract, I think
Heh. Well, to balance it out we could have
Can't/won't attend and it's breaking my heart
Can't/won't attend and I could care less
Can't/won't attend and I'll be dancing at my escape from you bastiges
but I'm not sure what we'd accomplish. Happy families, yadda yadda.
Just as long as people don't get lost in a morass of semantics, I guess.
With the last one being our first line of decision.
Whichever city gets the most "Can't/won't attend in this city" answers, if any, loses?
Should it be two parts then? One question asks "Which One City," while the second part asks "How Do You Feel About It?"
ita says what I'm trying to say, but she uses fewer words.
There should be part of the poll that's just a yes/no, Seattle/SF question.
Being in the head of the person who generated the language, I don't understand what's confusing about the options. I'm more than happy to change it, but I don't know how to make it clearer without reducing the usefulness significantly.
There should be part of the poll that's just a yes/no, Seattle/SF question.
With the current language, why?
I think the question seems to me to be asking two different things that should be separated into their own questions - 'yes/no' and 'how do you feel about it.'
Maybe they don't need to be separate. I don't know.
So, 3 questions, then. Seattle: Can/Can't, SF: Can/Can't, Favourite: Seattle/SF/either?