We've never had an open bar.
We did in N.O.
I got stabbed, you know, right here.
Mal ,'Shindig'
F2F 3: Who's Bringing the Guacamole?
Plan what to do, what to wear (you can never go wrong with a corset), and get ready for the next BuffistaCon: San Francisco, May 19-21, 2006! Everything else, go here! Swag!
NoiseDesign - Aug 25, 2005 10:04:44 am PDT #4582 of 10001
Our wings are not tired
brenda m - Aug 25, 2005 10:05:28 am PDT #4583 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
Mild Negative
My problem with this is that it doesn't tell us whether the person will/probably will come or not. Would anyone else find it more helpful to say
Definitley come
Probably come
Probably won't come
Definitely won't come
or something along those lines?
DebetEsse - Aug 25, 2005 10:12:07 am PDT #4584 of 10001
Woe to the fucking wicked.
But that's not really enough. If someone'd definately come, either way, but would prefer one, that isn't reflected at all.
I suppose Question 3 might be enough to deal with that.
brenda m - Aug 25, 2005 10:21:55 am PDT #4585 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
I suppose Question 3 might be enough to deal with that.
That's what I was thinking.
deborah grabien - Aug 25, 2005 10:22:22 am PDT #4586 of 10001
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.
Okay - keeping in mind that I tend to not be in here unless I'm personally involved (this time, an obvious yes), and don't have a lot of the history.
I don't want to kerfuffle anything here, so let's have a code phrase: if this method is kerfuffle-making, Debet, for heavens sake, say "DEB! BAD! NO!" and let's move on.
Since we only have two cities in the running, shouldn't it be simpler than this? Preferred, second choice, will attend either?
I have this uneasy feeling in the pit of my tum about suggesting that, but it honestly seems simplest, with only two choices on the table.
brenda m - Aug 25, 2005 10:28:27 am PDT #4587 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
It totally should, and I'm sorry if I'm coming across as argumentative. I'm just leery of a situation like last year, where I get the feeling a lot of people voted for where they most wanted to go, and no so much for where they were most likely to go, if you get my meaning. Admittedly, these two cities are much less likely to have that sort of issue.
Nicole - Aug 25, 2005 10:35:39 am PDT #4588 of 10001
I'm getting the pig!
Yeah, last year was quite a different situation. The one and only vote was between three or four (I'm thinking four) cities. This year should be much simpler.
NoiseDesign - Aug 25, 2005 10:36:37 am PDT #4589 of 10001
Our wings are not tired
There were four cities in the final vote, but there was a fair amount of narrowing of cities before that.
DebetEsse - Aug 25, 2005 10:37:29 am PDT #4590 of 10001
Woe to the fucking wicked.
The problem, Deb, is that it doesn't take into account people who will attend either, but have a clear preference. I'm trying to come up with a ballot that accounts for both willingness/ability to attend and enthusiasm for the location, which, I think, is similar to what you're saying, Brenda.
NoiseDesign - Aug 25, 2005 10:39:54 am PDT #4591 of 10001
Our wings are not tired
We could have voting via short essay.
t /smartass
Oh who the hell am I kidding, that never closes.