San Francisco San Francisco San Francisco San Francisco!
Ima be there that weekend no matter where the F2F is...
Wash: Don't fall asleep now. Sleepiness is weakness of character. Ask anyone. You're acting captain. Know what happens you fall asleep now? Zoe: Jayne slits my throat, and takes over. Wash: That's right. Zoe: And we can't stop it.
'Shindig'
F2F 3: Who's Bringing the Guacamole?
Plan what to do, what to wear (you can never go wrong with a corset), and get ready for the next BuffistaCon: San Francisco, May 19-21, 2006! Everything else, go here! Swag!
Nora Deirdre - Aug 25, 2005 6:48:58 am PDT #4560 of 10001
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)
deborah grabien - Aug 25, 2005 7:08:01 am PDT #4561 of 10001
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.
(metaphorically macking on nora)
DebetEsse - Aug 25, 2005 7:55:47 am PDT #4562 of 10001
Woe to the fucking wicked.
Well, voting starts tomorrow. Because we've only got 2 options, I'm trying to get as much gradiation as possible, so, the (potential) ballot:
San Francisco:
- Oh, Hell yes!
- That would be spiffy
- Eh, I guess I'll go there
- Uh, no
Seattle:
- Oh, Hell yes!
- That would be spiffy
- Eh, I guess I'll go there
- Uh, no
I, in my heart of hearts, would prefer:
- San Francisco
- Seattle
Tom Scola - Aug 25, 2005 7:58:43 am PDT #4563 of 10001
Remember that the frontier of the Rebellion is everywhere. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward.
I, in my heart of hearts, would prefer:
- San Francisco
- Seattle
- I'm thrilled with either one!
DebetEsse - Aug 25, 2005 7:59:46 am PDT #4564 of 10001
Woe to the fucking wicked.
Ok. I assumed if peopel had no preference, they'd leave it blank, but I can put a tickybox option
brenda m - Aug 25, 2005 7:59:50 am PDT #4565 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
Oh, Hell yes!
That would be spiffy
These seem kind of redundant to me. Or maybe it's the spiffy and the eh that are redundant. Either way, we've got three yes options - do we need so many? I'd drop the spiffy in the interest of simplicity.
DebetEsse - Aug 25, 2005 8:06:29 am PDT #4566 of 10001
Woe to the fucking wicked.
I was going for a mild positive and a mild negative, which I'd like to keep, rather than just a neutral in the middle.
I can re-word if that's unclear
§ ita § - Aug 25, 2005 8:09:23 am PDT #4567 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Sort of an "on a scale of 1 to 4 (1 being no), how do you rate the potential destinations?" thing?
DebetEsse - Aug 25, 2005 8:16:10 am PDT #4568 of 10001
Woe to the fucking wicked.
Yes, ita
brenda m - Aug 25, 2005 8:17:55 am PDT #4569 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
I was going for a mild positive and a mild negative, which I'd like to keep, rather than just a neutral in the middle.
Yeah, I get that but...I guess at this point I feel like we're straying from what is (IMO) the important question. Not "how much do you like this city?" but "will you come?" The first option (and the bonus question) will suss out whether there's a real excitement building around one or the other, which is good to know. But past that, I'm not sure what the gradations tell us, and they have the potential to make make our final tally more complicated. YMMV, of course, and it's more than possible I'm over-thinking this, as I am wont to do.