Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
This is hardly surprising, but it's interesting that a publication such as the
Chicago Sun-Times
should be completely trashing the Zune:
Writing in the Chicago Sun-Times, Andy Ihnatko unloads on the Zune with both barrels, calling it a "complete, humiliating failure" and a "colossal blunder," because Microsoft has taken the user out of its design considerations and put the music industry (in the person of Universal's Doug Morris, "a big, clueless idiot") in their place.
Yes, Microsoft's new Zune digital music player is just plain dreadful. I've spent a week setting this thing up and using it, and the overall experience is about as pleasant as having an airbag deploy in your face.
"Avoid," is my general message. The Zune is a square wheel, a product that's so absurd and so obviously immune to success that it evokes something akin to a sense of pity...
The Zune is a complete, humiliating failure. Toshiba's Gigabeat player, for example, is far more versatile, it has none of the Zune's limitations, and Amazon sells the 30-gig model for 40 bucks less.
Throw in the Zune's tail-wagging relationship with music publishers, and it almost becomes important that you encourage people not to buy one.
The whole thing is great - he really rips MS a new one....
Sun-Times article: [link]
Boing-Boing: [link]
It sounds like he gave the Zune a good workout, too, so it's not like he's writing from a first impression. This review reeks of the contempt you develop over a good period of time....
It sounds like he gave the Zune a good workout, too, so it's not like he's writing from a first impression. This review reeks of the contempt you develop over a good period of time....
My goodness, doesn't it. I've been idly following the press about the Zune, mostly out of morbid curiosity.
Try senuTi
Thanks, DCJ! I realized when meara asked her question that I had the exact same question and it seems to be working great after a minor mishap that was entirely user error.
So, in other computer related news, I am giving some very serious thought to trying to switch over to Ubuntu. Though I do also have some video games that require Windows to run, and this box in particular to meet the various game hardware requirements.
I do have some older hardware -- my Frankenbox, that ND put together for me out of his old spare parts, and an old power PC that's straining hard to run an outdated version of MacOSX.
Would trying to install a dual-boot on my good box (for which I don't actually have the XP Pro install disk, btw) be biting off more than I can chew/asking for more headache than I really want? Or should I just try the install on one of my older boxes and play with that for a while.
(Yes, it's a question that more or less answers itself, but I'm asking it anyway)
Installing a dual-boot system is no trouble at all -- especially with something like Ubuntu, which is designed to be super-easy to set up. It is easiest to give Linux a hard drive of its own if you can spare one, however.
Is Ubuntu a good way to get back into Linux (I used to play in Unix, but waaay back when it was LUI)? I've been wanting to tinker with a Linux distribution of some sort for a while, and have seen Ubuntu mentioned in here once or twice.
Given that you have a box to spare, I might go for a single install on the older hardware anyway, but if you do want to go dual-boot, there's really no hassle about it.
on edit: I love Ubuntu (specifically, Xubuntu, but I'm a little weird that way). It's very easy to set up and manage, which is really what you're picking when you choose a linux distro, since the programs you can get are pretty much the same with all of them. My old Fedora systems were utterly clunky by comparison.
It would probably be wisest to test-drive on an older machine regardless, since I have one or two to spare.
