Thanks amych
I am using Blackboard Academic Suite™ (6.3.1.574) on a Windows XP professional with Internet Explorer (I can't figure out which version). I already foudn that Blackboard and Firefox don't seem to play nicely!
Lorne ,'Time Bomb'
Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
Thanks amych
I am using Blackboard Academic Suite™ (6.3.1.574) on a Windows XP professional with Internet Explorer (I can't figure out which version). I already foudn that Blackboard and Firefox don't seem to play nicely!
I am using Blackboard for my online class now, but I am still figuring it out myself and don't know how to fix your problem with it.
They should! but that's a separate rant for another time.... I'll see what I can find for you about test uploads after my next way-too-many meetings.
Can someone explain why tables for layout are so depreciated. I did a CSS replacement for a table layout and it has seperate hacks for netscape 4.0 , I.E. below 7 and I.E 7. It still doesn't work right in opera. At this point I'm ready to go back to friggin table - where none of the three columns will overlap in any browsers. By the time you have to a seperate "Div" for what would have been a cell in a table, what exactly does any of this gain?
When I did some reading on CSS a while ago, it was pretty well acknowledged that layout issues that could be easily solved with a table were still a major hurdle in CSS.
You've probably done the same reading, but I could dig out a few sites and the sample code they produced, if it would help.
I think they (standards people) want tables in CSS mostly for philosophical reasons. i.e, the idea tha only content goes in the HTML, and all formatting stuff goes in CSS.
I asked a similar question about tables a while back: and Plei slapped me down (in a good way!).
I'm still using tables. Who knew I was an old-fashioned girl?
I'm sorry- I have another question that seems really stupid to me, but I just don't know the answer.
I have been asked to help make a brochure look nicer. The person who designed it (who is less knowledgable about the graphic arts than I) has images on it that are 96 dpi, but we're sending it to a commercial printer
a) am I right in saying those images will not print well
b) where does one get 300 dpi images with which to play around with in photoshop? He has a globe, some tissue under a microscope and some microbes under a microscope. Of course, no one wants to pay for anything....If I had illustrator, which I do not, I would be tempted to try and "draw" these things using something from the built in brushes, etc, but I am assuming that photoshop does not have these things (for some reason, I am just better at doing things other than random phtot retouching in Illustrator)
I am having a random and crappy day filled with tech problems that are above my head but everyone seems to think I should know.
Signed,
Not really a tech person OR a graphic designer
am I right in saying those images will not print well
Yes. They'll look nice on a monitor (monitors are typically 96 dpi), but they'll look like crap when printed.