Prepare to uncouple -- uncouple.

Oz ,'Same Time, Same Place'


Buffistechnology 2: You Made Her So She Growls?  

Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!


tommyrot - Jan 26, 2006 11:25:18 am PST #6868 of 10003
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Have you tried more than one CD?

Yes.

One CD burner refused to burn the CDs, which is why I used the DVD burner.

Well, if nothing else works I'll bring my IBook to work tomorrow and connect it to the computer in question (which is off the network as we suspect it has a virus). The CD burner on my iBook is incredibly unfinicky, so hopefully it can use the blank CDs.


tommyrot - Jan 26, 2006 1:02:02 pm PST #6869 of 10003
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Did someone post here the results of speed tests on the new Intel iMac not measuring up to what Jobs claimed? Or did I read that someplace else? Anyway, this Slashdot post says it's not so:

madgunde writes "Looks like MacWorld magazine was a little premature in reporting that the new Apple iMac Core Duo doesn't live up to Apple's speed claims. The folks over at MacSpeedZone have done some performance testing of their own that debunks MacWorld's results and shows that the new iMac Core Duo DOES live up to the hype. Not only did the new iMac wipe the floor with the old model in their tests, but using MacWorld's own test methodology would allow MacSpeedZone to conclude that the new Intel iMac is almost as fast as a PowerMac Quad G5. " I see only one way to solve this: Give me one. I'll run WoW on it, and decide.

[link]


Gris - Jan 26, 2006 1:14:15 pm PST #6870 of 10003
Hey. New board.

Exciting!

t looks impatiently at date, which is not yet February 15th

t listens worriedly to the scary sounds iBook has started making more regularly

t hopes that MacBook comes sooner, rather than later


Gris - Jan 26, 2006 5:42:16 pm PST #6871 of 10003
Hey. New board.

Okay, I have an honest-to-goodness Tech Support question for folks more familiar with windows and/or networks than me.

A few days ago, Gershwin Girl's internet starting giving her serious problems in her apartment. She's running off of a wireless router that I configured for her, and until a few days ago everything worked great.

The router still works perfectly on my computer, and on her roommates' computers. In fact, I'm sending this message from her wireless right now and, as you can see, no issues.

But her computer loads websites about 1 out of every 10 tries, disconnects her from gaim with regularity, and is otherwise incredibly annoying. Sometimes it will work great for an hour or so, but never for extended periods.

Her internet DID work fine when she was connected to a different wireless network. Overall, I'm confused. Any ideas?


beth b - Jan 26, 2006 6:23:11 pm PST #6872 of 10003
oh joy! Oh Rapture ! I have a brain!

TIVO question my BIL just bought a TIVO ( Or is buying) Has anyone used the TIVO wireless router? and does anyone else use a wireless connection. We went wired because we just punched a quick whole in the wall and at the time - thier were a lot of complaints about getting wireless to work


NoiseDesign - Jan 26, 2006 6:48:00 pm PST #6873 of 10003
Our wings are not tired

I've been running wireless Tivo for quite a while and I've set it up for two other people. As long as you are using the Tivo branded adapter or one of the very specific models they list on their support site it's quite easy. The trick is that almost all of the ones that they list are versions or firmware revisions that aren't easily obtainable.

The best way to go is to buy the Tivo branded WiFi adaptor.


DebetEsse - Jan 26, 2006 7:01:17 pm PST #6874 of 10003
Woe to the fucking wicked.

I use TiVo with a wireless connection. I haven't had any problems. I got a supported one (on the second try. Stupid serial numbers) at Best Buy.


beth b - Jan 26, 2006 7:06:06 pm PST #6875 of 10003
oh joy! Oh Rapture ! I have a brain!

Thanks !


Deena - Jan 26, 2006 9:44:31 pm PST #6876 of 10003
How are you me? You need to stop that. Only I can be me. ~Kara

Gris, does she have a cordless phone? Or does someone nearby have one? That was the biggest problem my son was having, that his cordless runs on 2.4 Ghz and so did the router, and the phone constantly disconnected him or screwed with the router performance.


tommyrot - Jan 27, 2006 4:24:00 am PST #6877 of 10003
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

I have not had my caffeine yet, so I can't decide if this is a bad thing, and if so, how bad...

Cory Doctorow: Vista, the new version of Windows, has tightened the Trusted Computing screws, putting hardware companies on notice that they will have to get their drivers approved by Microsoft before shipping them. Microsoft had previously designed Vista to simply warn users if their drivers were "unsigned" -- that is, not approved by Microsoft -- but in a new announcement, the company pledged to make it impossible to load any unapproved drivers under Vista.

This has been positioned as an anti-spyware measure, but it will also have the effect of making copy- and use-restriction systems more restrictive. You won't, for example, be able to install alternative drivers for a video-capture card that lets you ignore anti-copying watermarks in your videos, effectively taking control away from you, the owner of the computer, and indiscriminately giving it over to anyone who can insert a watermark (no-copying watermarks have already been illegally inserted into many Fox programs, resulting in their not being stored by TiVo video recorders).

Another effect of this will be to raise the cost of developing drivers, since developers will be required by Microsoft to buy a VeriSign Class 3 Commercial Software Publisher Certificate, at an unknown cost.

[link]

It just bugs me, as it furthers the trend of the personal computer moving from a general-purpose computing device to a home-entertainment device that's controlled by large media companies.