iPod has some of the most viral marketing.

So I'm a viral marketer. Cool!

ita, see here. [link]

Ironically, that page is blocked by Websense. What's it say?

Net Nanny is one of the lesser-used blocking programs; very few Peacefire members have indicated that it is being used at their school, and a survey of 24 libraries using blocking software did not include any that were using Net Nanny. However, in 1997, a student at Central Texas Community College reported that the software was being used on campus computer terminals. Then, in February 1998, Friends University installed Net Nanny on their campus computer system. In the latter case, staff at Friends University reported that the software blocked information on sexually transmitted diseases, the politics of prostitution, and even a site about Adam and Eve. Net Nanny was one of the four blocking software programs criticized in the 1996 article "Keys to the Kingdom", which listed some of the sites blocked by Net Nanny, CYBERsitter and Cyber Patrol. Although the authors wrote that the list of blocked sites used by each program was encrypted and could not be read by the user, Net Nanny comes with an unencrypted list of about 3,500 blocked sites -- making it the only program so far that allows the administrator to see the list. It also blocks much less than any of the competing programs (which usually come with "blocked site lists" of about 100,000 Web sites). Net Nanny has claimed that they give more control to the administrator (i.e. parent, teacher or librarian) by not encrypting their list; however, Peacefire members whose schools are using the software have reported that the default sites selected by Net Nanny are blocked in the overwhelming majority of cases. Because filtering software companies usually encrypt their blocked site lists to protect them from being used by competitors, Net Nanny has less motivation to encrypt their list, since it represents an investment of much less time and money.

Although the blocked site list is short, Net Nanny employes a more severe word filtering mechanism than most other programs. It is often reported that blocking software will block an entire page based on the occurrence of a single word. This is not usually true; Cyber Patrol and SurfWatch will block pages only if a banned word appears in the URL, and CYBERsitter will simply remove the word from the page. Net Nanny, however, blocks all pages by default that contain the words "sex", "drugs" or "pornography", and can even be configured to hang up the modem or lock up the computer if a banned word appears on the screen. This was the default configuration reported to be in use at the Central Texas Community College. For example, the Net Nanny FAQ (which has since been removed from the Web) states:

"So if your kids do a lot of e-mailing or go into chat rooms within IRC you can still take action. Say your kid’s friend e-mails him a pipe bomb recipe. If 'bomb' is in your dictionary Net Nanny goes to work." Although Net Nanny blocks fewer Web sites than any competitors, it does block access to about the same number of newsgroups, including:

bit.listserv.aidsnews clari.tw.health.aids misc.health.aids sci.med.aids alt.feminism soc.feminism as well as the Banned Books page at Carnegie Mellon and Femina.com, which describes itself as a "comprehensive, searchable directory of links to female friendly sites and information on the World Wide Web". While the Banned Books page and Femina.com are blocked because the URL's exist as entries on Net Nanny's blocked site list, more Web sites are blocked because they contain keywords which activate Net Nanny's word filter. TIME journalists reported in an August 1997 article that Net Nanny blocked the National Organization for Women Web site (which was the source of much more controversy when the same Web site was blocked by CYBERsitter). A Friends University professor also described being denied access to information the Episcopal Church's position on homosexuality, at an unspecified Web site.

Net Nanny is the only program which includes the names of mailing lists on its list of banned keywords, including:

aids-stat-request@wubios.wustl.edu -- (continued...)

( continues...) according to a description at [link] this is the "discussion list is for the distribution of AIDS statistics from various agencies", mainly the Center for Disease Control's monthly AIDS Surveillance Report act-up-request@world.std.com -- the mailing list of AIDS Coalition To Unleash Power eagles-request@flash.usc.edu -- described as a "discussion list for scouts, scout-masters, and former scouts who identify as gay, lesbian, or bisexual" noglstp-request@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov -- the mailing list of the "National Organization of Gay and Lesbian Scientists and Technical Professionals", whose web site describes the group as an organization opposing discrimination and stereotyping in the sciences "Keys to the Kingdom" also reported that Net Nanny blocked all mailing lists run by the Department of Computer Science at the University of Colorado at Boulder. Said the authors of the article, "Guess those computer geeks talk blue when they're not pumping out C code."

NetNanny blocks access to any sites on its blacklist

· It blocks pages containing over four words that are on NetNanny’s list of objectionable words.

· It masks objectionable words on web sites, IRC chat rooms, news groups and plain text emails, replacing letters with ####.

Hmm. I'm pretty sure it's not a keyword thing -- most of the page blocked is names. And honestly, as much as I'd giggle to think I'd made their radar -- puh-lease.

Weird.

Mythical Motorola/Apple iPod phone maybe will happen for real: [link]

"The Always With You mobile handsets will be able to carry about a dozen iTunes songs downloaded from a PC or Macintosh starting in the first half of next year."

That's like the dark ages of CDs.

CSS is eating my brain. I have styled my links thusly:

a { color : #000000; background-color : transparent; text-decoration : none; }
a:link, a:visited { border-bottom : 1px dotted #000000; }

All the text looks just fine. But I have a picture that is a link, that's in a div styled thusly:

#picture { border: none; }

Whis is in a div styled thusly:

#pictureblock {
text-align:center;
margin:0px auto;
border-width: thin;
border-style: groove;
border-color: black;
}

I'd hoped the border:none would get rid of the underline, but not. My hierarchy seems off. I want to accomplish this change in the CSS, not in the HTML, since I'm sharing the HTML. What am I missing?

ReplayTV 40-hour DVRs from $40 (updated)** - 9:59 am

http://dealnews.com/newsdaily.html?article,77315

Digital Networks' ReplayTV Outlet Store has the factory-refurbished ReplayTV RTV5504 40-hour Digital Video Recorder for $99.99. A $10 off coupon code ("PW55A4N") and $50 mail-in rebate combine to yield a net price of $39.99. Shipping is free. It's the lowest total price we've seen, although Amazon.com has the same unit, new and factory-sealed, for $104.99 shipped before the rebate, $54.99 after. Offer ends December 31. Update: Amazon.com cut its price the new ReplayTV RTV5504 40-hour to $99.99 before a $50 mail-in rebate, $49.99 after, with free shipping. Also of note, TiVo's competing model costs the same after rebate.