Mal: Then I call it a win. What's the problem? Inara: Should I start with the part where you're stranded in the middle of nowhere, or the part where you have no clothes?

'Trash'


Buffistechnology 2: You Made Her So She Growls?  

Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!


tommyrot - Jun 16, 2005 7:33:30 am PDT #3415 of 10003
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

I need to see if there's a digital that can share lenses with my optical.

There are a lot of digital SLRs that do that. Some digital SLRs even come without a lens so you can use your existing lenses if you want.

I have an older HP digital SLR. I can attach a regular telephoto or wide angle lense to it, although I have yet to do so.


§ ita § - Jun 16, 2005 7:36:50 am PDT #3416 of 10003
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

There are a lot of digital SLRs that do that

It's not the digital I'm wondering about, so much as my traditional SLR for which I've already bought good lenses -- that's the compatibility angle I need to start shopping from.

I think it's a Nikon, but it's been in that bag forever. Since shortly before Burrell's first MonkeyPants was born, for sure.


Sue - Jun 16, 2005 7:53:50 am PDT #3417 of 10003
hip deep in pie

Kodak to stop making B&W paper. I guess the digital SLR is looking better and better.

They aren't the only producers of B&W paper left are they? I think I usually used to buy AGFA.

I think the digitals would share lenses with more electronic SLR's than older manual SLR's


§ ita § - Jun 16, 2005 7:56:52 am PDT #3418 of 10003
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I think I usually used to buy AGFA.

I'm an Ilford girl myself. But it does sound like an early death knell.


Sue - Jun 16, 2005 8:02:41 am PDT #3419 of 10003
hip deep in pie

But it does sound like an early death knell.

I have to admit that I bought an enlarger a fwe years ago, and I have never used it, because I don't have a suitable set-up and I'm leery of the chemicals.


§ ita § - Jun 16, 2005 8:09:26 am PDT #3420 of 10003
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I am leery myself of running my own shop for the same reasons -- so I really need to sign up for a community college class or something so I can get back to it. I like the dark room.


NoiseDesign - Jun 16, 2005 8:24:15 am PDT #3421 of 10003
Our wings are not tired

I think the digitals would share lenses with more electronic SLR's than older manual SLR's

It is a bit tricky exactly which lenses, but typically as long as it's a lens than can work with the autofocus system then they transfer. Canon and Nikon digitals both do this. However since the CCD on the digital cameras is smaller than the 35mm film plate it has the effect of changing the working length of the lens. I think it's around a 1.5 conversion. So a 300mm lens becomes a 200mm.


DXMachina - Jun 16, 2005 8:30:56 am PDT #3422 of 10003
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

I loved having access to the department dark room when I was in grad school. I miss it.


Sue - Jun 16, 2005 8:31:20 am PDT #3423 of 10003
hip deep in pie

I like the dark room.

Me too. I like printing picture much more than procesing film. My first teacher made us process on steel reels, and they were a bitch.


DXMachina - Jun 16, 2005 8:33:17 am PDT #3424 of 10003
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

Once I got used to them, I much preferred steel reels to the plastic ones.