OK, other question: I'm thinking of buying a digital camera for my trip. I totally should've decided this earlier, but I got sucked into looking at them on the internet and...well, you know how it goes. My question is, how much of a memory card do I need to get to go along with it? Never having had a digital camera before, I have no idea how many pictures fit in how much space (I know it depends on how nice a resolution you're using, but I have no idea if a 64MB is sufficient or if I need to spring for the crazy expensive 1gig or what?)
'Underneath'
Buffistechnology 2: You Made Her So She Growls?
Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
if a 64MB is sufficient
Probably not. My Olympus is a couple years old and only 2.1megapixels, and I carry two 128Mb cards with it.
I've only actually needed that much memory when I was on a week-long trip without my laptop, but I was glad I had it.
Heh--well, I'll be on a 2 1/2 week long trip without my laptop, so...yeah. Huh, I suppose (silly me) I hadn't thought about the possibility of buying MULTIPLE cards. Riiiiiight. Options.
I'd say get at least a 512 MB and a 128 or 256 as a second card, on the off chance you fill the 512 before you can offload pics you have a backup card to toss in the camera.
It's probably cheaper to buy one large card than multiple smaller ones. 128Mb was the largest available when I bought my camera. I took lots of pictures and discarded most of them.
Having lots of memory to play with means you can save the pictures in higher quality formats, which really pays off later when you crop and edit.
I like having a second card just as a safety. I tend to shoot a huge quantity of pictures with my camera and have filled my 256 a couple of times (And mine is only a 2 Megapixel). It also means that I can be offloading pictures with one card while still shooting.
When I hit control click, and hit "download linked file as..." it downloaded the page, not the file.
Then I think downloading Firefox is the best bet. That's what I usually do when I run into some Javascript on a web page that doesn't work with Safari.
Sigh. Damn, that's lame. Apple! Fix your browser, dangit!
Not a matter of fixing so much as updating.
I think there's a new one with Tiger, I don't know if it'll be backrolled to OS X 10.3.x or not.
No clues about my Azureus problem?