I finally got in, after 4 hours of server errors. Sadly, nobody was trying desperately to get in touch with me.
Wash ,'The Message'
Buffistechnology 2: You Made Her So She Growls?
Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
For ita and other interested folk:
re: Viewsonic VX2000 LCD DVI monitors -
an incompatibility exists between VX2000 series monitors and NVidia 52xx and 56xx video cards when connected via DVI.
Apparantly the Windows driver has a workaround, but Linux users are SOL:
Known WINDOZE XP workaround: After many calls to Viewsonic I was able to get through to a sane engineer. He was able to reproduce the problem and found a workaround in Windows. That workaround was to change the timing from "Auto" to "DMT" (Discrete Monitor Timing) and to enable Horizontal Cloning. After that was done the card seemed to remember those settings and I could leave it on the DVI connector and actually be able to see my text consoles and POST screens etc...
Doesn't really help me, as the Mac Mini uses "ATI Radeon 9200 with 32MB of DDR SDRAM with AGP 4X support"
ita, what graphics card are you using?
Doesn't really help me, as the Mac Mini uses "ATI Radeon 9200 with 32MB of DDR SDRAM with AGP 4X support"
What version of the ATI Radeon driver are you using, Tommyrot?
If the Mac Minis have been sitting in a warehouse, they might not have the November update: [link]
The issue is probably related to two different styles of digital signaling used in digital displays. Tom's Hardware discusses it here in reference to various video cards you can buy and how well they work with digital displays. In particular, this page discusses the differences.
What version of the ATI Radeon driver are you using, Tommyrot?
I'll check when I get home. I've been poking around at the ATI site myself.
Apparantly there's the "ATI Displays control pannel" that I should have (Unless I don't have it because the graphics chip is built-in and not an add-in card?)
I should be able to install that new driver, right? I mean, it shouldn't make any difference that the graphics chip is built-in, and not a card, right?
Oof, good luck, Tommy!
Question for y'all: Just got a warning in the mail that the warranty on my Powerbook is about to be over, and did I want to buy the extra two years of AppleCare? It's $350, which seems like a heck of a lot, but I suppose if the thing goes to hell, would seem cheap. So, um, do people think it's necessary? I'm the sort of person who tends to not go for that, and worry about problems if/when they come, but....
The drivers you download from ATI's website are only for cards you buy at retail. Apple delivers updated drivers for the built-in and bundled cards as part of system software updates.
Well, it does say it requires "October 2004 ATI RADEON Universal ROM Update or higher for full advanced feature-set"
Might want to check the revision, first.
Still? Worth emailing ATI support.
ETA: Rob, it does say it supports "Apple OEM/CTO RADEON Products
- All Apple desktop and portable systems with preinstalled RADEON graphics"
The issue I'd have is "this is a new product, might not be covered under two-month-old documents."
I'm thinking about doing an iPod car integration for my GF for her birthday but I have no idea a) what it should reasonably cost b) the best way to do it (she's a tech geek and I wouldn't want to do it too cheaply cause that'd ruin it for her). Does anyone have any suggestions for me?