iTunes does not have super-tagging. It's very annoying, actually. There aren't even any really good external super-tagging programs for Macs that I've found.

Had I thought of it, I would have warned you not to let it reorganize your files for you. The file structure iTunes uses is very nice if you use iTunes itself to rip most of your files, but it often causes problems for people with large collections made by other jukeboxes. It's a very "iTunes is the end all be all of music programs and why would you ever use anything else?" type thing much of the time. I run into some similar problems when I try to play music through my Xbox that you had with the Tivo, though I'm getting the hang of bending iTunes to my wishes.

Can anyone tell me why this page looks like crap in IE/WinXP when this page looks just fine? They've got identical table structures. (Or, they should. It's possible I've got a typo in there somewhere, but from what I can see, IE is simply ignoring the width attribute on nycfilmcritic.)

In Firefox and Safari and IE/OSX, both pages look the same. I'm being driven maaaaaaaaaaaaad.

Actually, the page on the old site does odd things for in in IE6/win98, too, just not the same things as the new site. Lemme take a look.

What happens when you pour the text from the broken one into the working one? And is there anything in the style sheet that's off?

Looking at it, I can't tell what the problem is, but the the tables differ in width by a column, and length by a row. I'd start from identical on the working one, and make it over step by step with the content of the broken one, and see if it breaks.

Huh -- I can get it to work in IE (not perfectly, but I can live with it) if I lose the extra padding column on the left side (the total number of columns is the same). And IE still seems to be treating that width=148 attribute as a suggestion it can take or leave. Very strange.

I was just going to say what ita said. The tables are different. The newer one has the main text in a double column, with a small border column to its right, while the old one just uses a triple column for text with no right column.

And IE still seems to be treating that width=148 attribute as a suggestion it can take or leave.

I've had this problem when I've mixed units in specifying width. You're specifying them three different ways, by pixel, by percentage, and by default (in the main text columns), plus you've specified a percent for the table itself. IE can be easily confused.

Also, you don't need "px" in the width attribute.

IE can be easily confused.

I'm starting to realize that. Stoopid browser. Firefox and Safari understand just fine.

Also, you don't need "px" in the width attribute.

M'kay. Is it hurting anything to leave it there, though? I'm tired of messing with this.

okay. i bought a dvd burner for my computer and i installed it, but it's not working. now...i've only ever installed one cd burner so i probably did it wrong. the instructions are less than helpful. i did everything they suggested.

one thing that could be preventing this is the fact that i don't have 512 MB of RAM. it said it was recommended though. *sigh*

I can't even get the drive to open. help!!!

tiggy: what OS, and what brand/model of DVD burner? Also, can you describe what you did to install it?