Control your lustful urges, ladies and gaymen. Bill Gates strikes a pose for Teen Beat magazine
My eyes! My eyes!
Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
Control your lustful urges, ladies and gaymen. Bill Gates strikes a pose for Teen Beat magazine
My eyes! My eyes!
My eyes! My eyes!
I feel ill....
Quick! Someone change the topic! USB buttplugs, maybe?
Quick! Someone change the topic! USB buttplugs, maybe?
Hey, there's a reason they're called "thumb drives"....
We've mentioned that the little personal USB massager skeeves me, right? Because the fact that USB provides power does not mean that we must treat it like a cigarette lighter, which is being used for its original...okay, maybe not.
But really, it could be USB anything. The mind boggles.
We've mentioned that the little personal USB massager skeeves me, right?
You know, if you could get a web app to control it ...
Quick! Someone change the topic! USB buttplugs, maybe?
OMG. I laughed so loud in my office that people stopped and looked at me.
Of course, I cannot explain what I was laughing at.
No butt plugs that I know of, but there is this.
No butt plugs that I know of, but there is this.
Does that just turn on when you plug it in? or is it software controlled from, say, a remote location?
My mind is failing to grasp an elementary security principle. Client has router with NAT firewall built in. New DSL service rents DSL modem that is integrated with hub for attaching workstations - no firewall included. DSL provider wants to use crossover cable to attach workstation port on DSL hub to workstation port on router with firewall. Why does putting the DSL modem (with no firewall) connecting directly to the outside world inside the firewall not constitute a gaping security hole?
Previously the router had a cable modem attached to the WAN port. With that arrangement (as I understand it) The cable modem was outside the firewall, the workstations were inside the firewall. Maybe this is my false premise.