Lydia: Its removal from Burma is a felony and when triggered it has the power to melt human eyeballs. Giles: In that case I've severely underpriced it.

'Potential'


Lost: OMGWTF POLAR BEAR  

[NAFDA] This is where we talk about the show! Anything that's aired in the US (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though -- if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.


Sean K - Sep 29, 2005 10:48:57 am PDT #9383 of 10000
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

Even a strategically placed blink and you would miss it reference would have been okay with me.

Here's the thing, there may have been, and we just don't know it yet.

Don't know where it would have been.... Maybe something about Bitch!Face's lawyer, or maybe both she and Saul Rubinek will be among the Others.

I could just be reaching, though.


Jessica - Sep 29, 2005 10:50:16 am PDT #9384 of 10000
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?

Even a strategically placed blink and you would miss it reference would have been okay with me.

The logo on the polar bear?

(Pretty meaningless, as references go, but that's all I can think of.)


Kate P. - Sep 29, 2005 11:08:09 am PDT #9385 of 10000
That's the pain / That cuts a straight line down through the heart / We call it love

Your reaction to my contention that Kate wiggling out of her bonds represented some of the best acting Evangeline Lilly has ever done on this show: now.

Actually, I thought the same thing. She was great in that scene, and it reminded me that there's a lot we still don't know about her past that I'm curious to know.


Topic!Cindy - Sep 30, 2005 3:42:30 am PDT #9386 of 10000
What is even happening?

Jess, how did you manage to chap your liver?

Peppermint Schnapps. Feel the sensation.

The flashback was truly weak. It felt like a pander to new viewers, or something. For the life of me I could not figure out why on earth they would show us that flashback narrative, because nothing new happened. Even the polar bear thing is really not anything.

I think that's exactly what it was--a pander to new viewers. Or, not even that it was pandering, but my guess is they don't want newcomers to feel like they can't watch this year, just because they missed it last year. I'd expect this for one more episode, at least.


Nora Deirdre - Sep 30, 2005 4:21:17 am PDT #9387 of 10000
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)

my guess is they don't want newcomers to feel like they can't watch this year, just because they missed it last year. I'd expect this for one more episode, at least.

I guess it is frustrating because of the many catch up specials, the DVDs, the repeating the previous episode before the new one... those are all things I don't need to see, 'cause I've seen it the first time, but they seem quite easy enough for a new viewer to get on board with if they have the inclination, I'm just annoyed that it bleeds into the new eps itself.

And this is no cult show - lots of people were already watching!

Now, a question- there was the mystery logo on the *stuffed* polar bear? When I read about the logo on the polar bear the other day, upthread, I read it that it was on the live, deadly polar bear.


le nubian - Sep 30, 2005 4:27:00 am PDT #9388 of 10000
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."

I guess it is frustrating because of the many catch up specials, the DVDs, the repeating the previous episode before the new one... those are all things I don't need to see, 'cause I've seen it the first time, but they seem quite easy enough for a new viewer to get on board with if they have the inclination, I'm just annoyed that it bleeds into the new eps itself.

Yes. They had another catchup special last week!


Allyson - Sep 30, 2005 8:21:27 am PDT #9389 of 10000
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica

Has anyone else read all the wanking going on between Fury in Rolling Stone and Javier Grillo-Marxauch in his Livejournal?

I'm an awful person, I think we've established, but I can't help but find producer_wank extraordinarily entertaining.


Consuela - Sep 30, 2005 8:29:06 am PDT #9390 of 10000
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

No, what are they wanking about?


Topic!Cindy - Sep 30, 2005 8:32:06 am PDT #9391 of 10000
What is even happening?

Allyson is it the current issue of RS? Also, what's Javier Grillo-Marxauch's lj name?


Allyson - Sep 30, 2005 8:46:02 am PDT #9392 of 10000
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica

It's the current issue. Fury basically says the writers' room was a mess, there's no plan, blah blah hack-cakes, and anyone who says different is lying.

Then Javier answers that all in his LJ, calling Fury on being a tool, that he was against the whole wheelchair thing, that there's a plan, blah blah Fury-hurt-my-feelings-cakes.

It's all very wanky, sort of like that time Jeff Pruitt got fired and accused Joss of trying to kill him, culminating in Pruitt losing his VIP access to the Bronze after a 12-hour drunken posting spree.

So the next time there's fandom wank, you can say, "I LEARNED IT BY WATCHING YOU!"