But in what fucked-up worldview is HANGING SOMEONE not considered psycho?
He could be ethically challenged, but not prone to psychotic breaks.
waves DSM IV in Tepalina's face
Also, I'm sure there have been instances of non-psycho hangmen. Some probably did it with a sense of mild regret and civic duty.
People, people. Just use the PCL-R. And your years of training.
Or just cop to the pop culture definition, of which the dude is certainly one.
I thought you said Blackadder for a second, and my mind went off on a weird tangent.
"I have a cunning plan...we hunt."
Or just cop to the pop culture definition, of which the dude is certainly one.
See, I could see Locke doing something like this and I don't think
he's
psycho. Just dangerous.
Like ita said, embrace the pop-culture use of "psycho." You'll find it embraces you right back, all warm and snuggly.
You can see Locke stalking, kidnapping and then killing one of the survivors and stringing him up? What would make him non-psycho in that scenario?
What would make him non-psycho in that scenario?
Apparently the
DSM IV
and a healthy dose of pedantry.
You'll find it embraces you right back, all warm and snuggly.
Sure. Right before it stabs you in the stomach, kidnaps you, and hangs your new boyfriend from a tree.
Like ita said, embrace the pop-culture use of "psycho." You'll find it embraces you right back, all warm and snuggly.
Pfft. Her cite doesn't even have a reference past 1990. Next thing you know you'll advocate loose definitions of gerunds and references to Josh Whedon and blithely mistaking Charlotte Bronte as the author of
Sense and Sensibility.
Standards, people! Elsewise, cats and dogs living together...
Elsewise, cats and dogs living together...
So that's who the Others in the woods are!