I think I'm agreeing with you, and I find it a little sad, too (the area of agreement, not the fact of agreeing).
Lost: OMGWTF POLAR BEAR
[NAFDA] This is where we talk about the show! Anything that's aired in the US (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though -- if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
I do still have some faint hope that Kate, despite being an apparently nice person, is actually guilty of some horrific crime that would have everyone who hears about it (including Sawyer) recoiling in shock. And I don't mean justifiable abused wife Burning Bed scenarios either, but something she made a cold-blooded decision to do no matter how much it hurt whoever.
I want Hurley to be evil, myself.
That would be incredibly cool.
Or maybe Claire could be. Just imagine:
CHARLIE: You never did say much about your baby's father. What's his name?
CLAIRE (cheerfully): Satan!
Sawyer reminds me of a guy Peter Berg told a story about on "Dinner For Five", a friend with, as he put it, authority issues. They were on location in South America and were stopped by bandits who made them get out of their cars and held them up at gunpoint. His friend refused to put his hands up when told, because he didn't want to do what they told him, even though he could have gotten himself and his friends killed. Berg said he and all the other guys were hissing and swearing at the guy to do what the guys with automatic weapons pointed at them said, but he didn't want "To give them the satisfaction." He finally put his hands up..about halfway.
For some guys, death or pain is less important than feeling in control, even if that feeling is not based in reality.
Evidence ita is a judgmental bitch:
They should have shot his ass. Just his, and left the rest of them alone.
Yeah, ita, that's how I felt--that's why I remembered the story.
Well, maybe not should have, but he was a self preservation instinct-deprived fool for not assuming that they would. There are things worth dying for, but IMHO avoiding being bossed around to the extent of raising one's hands isn't one of them.
From what I've heard, smack withdrawal is rough for a few days (Charlie should be pining for a pair or two of unsoiled jeans in his size now), but then basically over, and it's nowhere near as difficult as alcohol withdrawal. He'd still be psychologically addicted, but not suffering physical withdrawal.
Plus, we know he had been rationing his smack for two weeks, tapering off by force of will. I wonder if that has anything to do with how much withdrawl one gets. I mean as opposed to someone who is using ever increasing does until they have to be hospitalized, I guess.
I gather that it can be tapered to lessen symptoms to some extent. Lots of junkies don't actually take it enough to become physically addicted in the first place.
They also do methadone substitution just like with morphine addiction.