Might as well start randomizing now. Then you don't have to decide at which point to start if the list gets very long. Or not. Whatever works.
Hey, evil dead, you're in my seat.
Xander ,'First Date'
The Buffista Book Club: the Harry Potter iteration
This thread is a focused discussion group. Please see the first post below for the current topic and upcoming book discussions. While natter will inevitably happen, we encourage you to treat this like a virtual book club and try to keep your posts in that spirit.
By consensus, this thread is reopened specifically to discuss Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. It will be closed again once that discussion has run its course.
***SPOILER ALERT***
JenP - Oct 05, 2004 5:59:41 pm PDT #679 of 3301
brenda m - Oct 06, 2004 6:01:25 am PDT #680 of 3301
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
Sounds good. Do we want to consider giving folks an opportunity to throw a few more books on the list while we're getting this set up?
Wolfram - Oct 06, 2004 6:27:11 am PDT #681 of 3301
Visilurking
Sounds good. Do we want to consider giving folks an opportunity to throw a few more books on the list while we're getting this set up?
I think we left the book list open indefinitely, while cautioning folks to rec responsibly so the list doesn't become unmanageable. And FTR, the list of Buffistas interested in selecting a book is also open indefinitely.
Anyone have any suggestions for randomizing? Is there a program out there? Should we use the hat method?
Topic!Cindy - Oct 06, 2004 7:36:52 am PDT #682 of 3301
What is even happening?
Why don't we just take people in the order they volunteered? It seems pretty random, no?
libkitty - Oct 06, 2004 7:40:58 am PDT #683 of 3301
Embrace the idea that we are the leaders we've been looking for. Grace Lee Boggs
The hat works for me. Also, Lilty Cash's admin post #1 is behind, although not very. I'm not sure who can update it, hence the general posting.
Also, do we have a recent compilation of suggestions and suggestors that can be accessed online? What do people think about either adding that content, or a link to it, to the end of #1? Or, if a separate place would be preferred, perhaps P-C's #2 spot (only if you don't mind, P-C)?
Wolfram - Oct 06, 2004 7:50:43 am PDT #684 of 3301
Visilurking
Why don't we just take people in the order they volunteered? It seems pretty random, no?
I think it will work against interest if the 12th volunteer knows she/he won't be picking a book until next year.
The hat works for me.
Unless someone objects, I'm going to place Hec, JsW, BT, Trudy, libkitty and anyone else who volunteers by 2:00 p.m. in the hat, and pick out our next 3 selectors. Then I'll add erikaj to the volunteer list.
Also, do we have a recent compilation of suggestions and suggestors that can be accessed online? What do people think about either adding that content, or a link to it, to the end of #1? Or, if a separate place would be preferred, perhaps P-C's #2 spot (only if you don't mind, P-C)?
Sounds good to me.
JohnSweden - Oct 06, 2004 9:28:59 am PDT #685 of 3301
I can't even.
Also, do we have a recent compilation of suggestions and suggestors that can be accessed online? What do people think about either adding that content, or a link to it, to the end of #1?
I was just about to ask for that. Yes please?
Wolfram - Oct 06, 2004 9:53:54 am PDT #686 of 3301
Visilurking
Okay, using slips of paper and an actual hat, I've randomly chosen the next three selectors in the following order: 1) Libkitty; 2) billytea; and 3) John Sweden.
From what I can tell, the list is these four posts:
Maybe someone can clean them up and make a nice fresh new list for reposting?
ETA: And now the list of volunteers (which is always open) consists of Hec, Trudy and erikaj.
billytea - Oct 06, 2004 9:57:22 am PDT #687 of 3301
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.
Okay, using slips of paper and an actual hat, I've randomly chosen the next three selectors in the following order: 1) Libkitty; 2) billytea; and 3) John Sweden.
t shoulders mantle stoically
Does that mean I'll be choosing the book for mid-December? I'm going to suggest that I swap places with JS if he's ok with that, as I expect to reach Melbourne on Dec 10 or thereabouts, and will probably be ridiculously busy for the next couple of weeks. Mid-January will be less troublesome.
DavidS - Oct 06, 2004 9:57:49 am PDT #688 of 3301
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
Maybe someone can clean them up and make a nice fresh new list for reposting?
I'll do it.