Well crap - I'd stayed unspoiled for Fight Club for years until reading that shirt.
Aw, crap, I'm sorry! I think I had already seen the movies or known the spoilers for all of them except 300, which I didn't even realize could be spoiled.
This thread is a focused discussion group. Please see the first post below for the current topic and upcoming book discussions. While natter will inevitably happen, we encourage you to treat this like a virtual book club and try to keep your posts in that spirit.
By consensus, this thread is reopened specifically to discuss Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. It will be closed again once that discussion has run its course.
***SPOILER ALERT***
Well crap - I'd stayed unspoiled for Fight Club for years until reading that shirt.
Aw, crap, I'm sorry! I think I had already seen the movies or known the spoilers for all of them except 300, which I didn't even realize could be spoiled.
Why didn't you watch Fight Club years ago?
I think most of them, if you saw the shirt, you wouldn't know what they were referencing unless you'd already seen it.
I've tried to watch Fight Club a couple times, but couldn't stay with it, and somehow I never got spoiled-by-osmosis.
I mean, I knew what "Rosebud" signified years before I saw the movie, and I've never seen Soylent Green, but that spoiler's hard to avoid...but I didn't even know Fight Club had a twist. I thought it was just annoying.
(OK, not the movie thread, got it)
Hey! HP topic: How come only two of the Horcruxes could talk/seemed to have intelligence? I'm thinking of the journal and the locket, not Harry and Nagini, btw. And is it pronounced "hor-crucks" or "hor-crew"?
And is it pronounced "hor-crucks" or "hor-crew"?
I hope it's the former.
I hope it's the former.
Despite Rowling's tendency to name evil things à la française, I've always assumed it's "hor-kruks".
Speaking of spoilers, the onion weighs in on "Deathly Hallows":
Final Harry Potter Book Blasted For Containing Spoilers
NEW YORK—Harry Potter fans throughout the world were shocked, disappointed, and outraged to learn last week that J.K. Rowling's 750-page novel, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, blatantly answers every looming question in the 10-year-long saga, even going so far as to divulge what happens to key characters 20 years into the future.
"The whole experience is completely ruined for me," said 25-year-old fan Ethan Clay, adding that the book builds up suspense, and then, without warning, gives away vital, plot-altering information. "The least [Rowling] could have done was put a spoiler alert or something on the front cover."
I figure the journal had the most, because it contained so much of Tom Riddle. The locket had a rudimentary intelligence because of the contact with the bodies of the carriers. Maybe even it's contact with Harry set it off.
Well, the journal and the locket were the first two, right? So they contained arguably the most "human" parts of Riddle's soul. Maybe after that, the portions of his soul that were split off were so twisted by darkness that they didn't have that kind of power?
Speaking of spoilers, the onion weighs in on "Deathly Hallows":
Ahahahaha.