Please refer to [link] for the current topic and upcoming book discussions.
What would [link] be?
Willow ,'Storyteller'
This thread is a focused discussion group. Please see the first post below for the current topic and upcoming book discussions. While natter will inevitably happen, we encourage you to treat this like a virtual book club and try to keep your posts in that spirit.
By consensus, this thread is reopened specifically to discuss Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. It will be closed again once that discussion has run its course.
***SPOILER ALERT***
Please refer to [link] for the current topic and upcoming book discussions.
What would [link] be?
Name it what you like, I'm just here for the books.
(question: the "link" in the description should be to post #2, the first post, right?)
That is actually something I wanted to confirm, Jon ... I think it was decided it should be the first post in this thread. Can someone confirm?
Name it what you like, I'm just here for the books.
Yes ... I figured that out from previous posts. It is my nature to want the minutia out of the way.
The description only ever comes up if you're on the first page, right? On which the first post is clearly visible? Can't we just say, like, "See below" or something?
Jen, I vote yes.
Yep, we could, P-C. I bet either way is fine.
ETA: The hyphen. Dear lord, the hyphen.
Hey, my Nabokov & Ozeki recommendations fell off!
Anyway, if I have to hone down to two from the seven I've recommended, I'll go with House of Sleep by Jonathan Coe and The Intuitionist by Colson Whitehead. Unless some of y'all are dying to read or re-read Pale Fire, in which case I'm for Nabokov.
Jen, if you need a second to take the thread titling stuff to Bureau, count my hand as up.
Hey, my Nabokov & Ozeki recommendations fell off!
Fixed. Sorry 'bout that. Several others got cropped as well, but they are back on now.
Let the titling proceed. I think we have bullshitted our consensus (or consensed our bullshit).