I, for one, was not going for sequence of horcruxes destroyed, just making sure I got all of them by counting. Getting the sequence right is way beyone me.
I'd been assuming that the reason the Kedavra rebound didn't outright kill him was because of the Horcruxes. No?
Well, yes, but just by existing, not by getting used up in some way.
no mother's ever died trying to save her child before? Ever?
I can see it not coming up that often, that someone would hurl a killing curse at a child while it's mother was right there ready to fling herself in the way. It probably just wasn't a often public knowledge, because someone tries to kill you and you survive but your mother and the person who was trying to kill you don't (because they aren't all Horcruxed up), why explain to everyone what happened? And it just protected Harry from Voldemort, if the person attempting the killing wasn't all horcruxed up, him trying to kill you again wouldn't be an issue.
He split his soul that many times purely for the purposes of misdirection?
You could say that. Extra security, so when someone finds and destroys, say, the diary (as happened without anyone knowing what they were doing, exactly), he still had protection in place. Like if Davy Jones had been able to hide his heart in 6 different places, how much safer would he have been, right?
which is highly competitive and she must always be the best.
That sounds more like Slytherin than Gryffindor.
true, but Hermione only wants to be the best through her own merits. Remember when she didn't want to use the notes from the Half Blood Prince?
Remember when she didn't want to use the notes from the Half Blood Prince?
Yeah, Slytherin is more "by any means necessary".
Also, does Hermione really always need to be the best? I don't see competition as her motivating factor.
Also, does Hermione really always need to be the best?
In schoowork, I think so. I think that a lot of her identity is tied up in being the smart one, so she doesn't like it when she isn't.
I think that a lot of her identity is tied up in being the smart one, so she doesn't like it when she isn't.
But does she care if others do as well as she does? I'm not convinced.
Also, apparently Draco was the first person ever to disarm Dumbledore, even briefly. Which I wouldn't find so unlikely if it were someone other than Draco.
[thumbs through book]
"Dumbledore had wordlessly immobilized Harry, and the second he had taken to perform the spell had cost him the chance of defending himself." (p.584)
I thought I remembered it that way.
hermione wants to be the best, but I think she is pretty quick to know when she isn't good at something ( broom riding,predictions , etc) . And I really think it bothers her when someone does better than she does - in something she thinks she is good at. Or ignores how good she is.
I think that none of the houses are that different- they all just have a different emphasis on the same values. Tonks, for example, was a very talented wizard - and intelligent. I could see her in Ravenclaw. However, I think Tonks was interested in a more balanced life, therefore she ended up in Hufflepuff. (this is why I think the hat takes into account personal desires)
The fact that the Sorting is so important for me to figure out tells me that I am in the right profession.
The only part of the chain of wand possesion that I had trouble with was how Grindelwald got it. I can kind of explain it away as "Grindelwald disarmed Gregorovich, but Gregorovich somehow got back physical posession of the wand in a non-magical way, and then Grindelwald stole it," but that's a lot of convolution to not be explained, especially since it's a pretty major point later that just taking it in a non-magical-fight way isn't enough.
