Wolfram - I actually can't find where the natter line was stompy supported. Seems the other way to me.

After it was pointed out that discouraging natter is against the FAQ in spirit if not in letter, Hec suggested a more positive spin on it.

Here's Hec's natter line: "While natter will inevitably happen, we encourage you to treat this like a virtual book club and try to keep your posts in that spirit."

I said I'd take the discouraging natter line out of the proposal and suggested we use Hec's language in the slug.

I guess I assumed because nobody objected to this it had the tacit approval of the stompies. But in re-read that may not be the case.

Then again, if someone objects to the desciption, that will likely come up in Burea when we ask for the slug, descrip. and subtitle. So, David's amended description, then?

I'll third Strega's nomination for The Good Soldier--read it for my modern lit class, and it's good for provoking great discussion about POV!

Then again, if someone objects to the desciption, that will likely come up in Burea when we ask for the slug, descrip. and subtitle. So, David's amended description, then?

Works for me.

yep, I mentioned The Good Soldier in book club a couple weeks ago, very interesting, weighty book. Not a quick read, though it's relatively short.

I think it'd be come a popularity contest

Well, the original idea of the Select the Selectors plan was that the selectors would be selected randomly. Sorta kills the popularity thing. But I'm not feeling the pushing urge.

I'm going out of town soon. Hope to check back and find a working book club when I get back! Good luck, everybody!

(Yay books.)

Well, the original idea of the Select the Selectors plan was that the selectors would be selected randomly. Sorta kills the popularity thing. But I'm not feeling the pushing urge.

D'oh! I didn't catch that. Brainpower is on low today.

Brainpower is on low today.

Me too. I think there's something going around.

I guess I assumed because nobody objected to this it had the tacit approval of the stompies. But in re-read that may not be the case.

Errr... well I'm a stompy and I'm fine with it. But I don't think it's for a stompy to decide.

Speaking of stompies, if you want to use Lilty's first post as a "sticky" post, and she's not around, any stompy can edit any post (bwahahahaha!).

I'm reading The Good Soldier now, and I'd be thrilled to discuss it with Buffistas once I'm done.

Also, I'd like to sneak in a rec for Barbara Gowdy's Mister Sandman. The amazon.com review is here:

This riotous account of "the family unit" was a smash hit in Europe, Canada, and England. In the Times Literary Supplement, author Margaret Atwood (The Handmaid's Tale) praised Barbara Gowdy's novel as surprising and delightful, containing moments "at the same time preposterous and strangely moving." The Canary family guards many secrets, including the mystery of tiny daughter, Joan, who was dropped on her head at birth and has never spoken. Joan plays the piano like Mozart, yet has never had a lesson. The outrageous hilarity rises into a climax that creates a stunning new definition of family togetherness.

Also seconding the suggestions of Girl in Landscape, which has been on my meaning-to-read-it list for years, Homicide , Neil Gaiman's Sandman (though that may be a hard one because not all libraries stock graphic novels, and new it costs about $15 for one volume. but if we can do it, we should.) and anything by Lorrie Moore.