Have you guys seen the Baen Free Library? [link]

The authors (some of) whose books are available there include: Aaron Allston, Andre Norton, Christopher Anvil, Lois McMaster Bujold, John F. Carr, Paul Chafe, Rick Cook, John Dalmas, David Drake, Rosemary Edghill, Linda Evans, Eric Flint, Michael Flynn, Dave Freer, Mark A. Garland, Roland Green, Ellen Guon, Karen Koehler, Mercedes Lackey, Keith Laumer, Murray Leinster, Holly Lisle, Duncan Long, Howard L. Myers, Charles G. McGraw, Larry Niven, Jerry Pournelle, John Ringo, Richard Roach, James H. Schmitz, Ryk Spoor, D. W. St. John, Lars Walker, David Weber, K. D. Wentworth, and Michael Z. Williamson

The Gorey-styled HP thingy is fantastic. Loves it!

I'm trying to check out more mysteries -- Mysterious Affair at Styles could be interesting. Or another Agatha Christie, if others prefer.

I'm always up for Sherlock Holmes, ie, Baskervilles.

I'm always up for Sherlock Holmes, ie, Baskervilles.

I'm with connie.

I think that the "classics" idea is great, for my own selfish reasons, since it's highly more likely I'll be able to put my hands on a copy. I've kept an eye open on this thread, but could never get the relevant book (let alone on time) so I could never participate. Hopefully, now I will.

[Edited because at least in this thread I should pretend that I know how to spell.]

If people are interested, Harry G. Frankfurt's On Bullshit is short, inexpensive, and still on the NY Times' bestseller list.

Cool link, Deena!

I'd toss in a vote for Hound of the Baskervilles too. Whatever we end up with from Gutenbergs, I'll probably get a print copy through my library, but I was wondering if someone could reformat the text version from Gutenberg for easier reading. Maybe throw it up on a webpage somewhere? Also, during discussion, we'd be able to reference it easier.

I could probably do that, Wolfram.

I'm always up for Sherlock Holmes. The word we're going for here might be "obsessive." I do have the new annotated Holmes, so I could throw in information from that.

(edited because "through" is not "throw," even when you have a fever)

Thanks, Deena.

So is Harry Potter discussion officially done, or should we give it a little more time?