Angel ,'Chosen'
[NAFDA] "There will be an occasional happy, so that it might be crushed under the boot of the writer." From Zorro to Angel (including Wonderfalls and The Inside), this is where Buffistas come to anoint themselves in the bloodbath.
That almost unreal; I mean, perky is one thing, but wow. It's gotta be the camera angle, doesn't it? AB has my eye though. I might have had to watch this show even if it weren't Tim's. I'm glad it's Tim's though.
I should know this, but who's the guy next to AB?
It's Jay Harrington. He was on the ill-fated American version of Coupling with Colin.
So all roads lead back to ita, for those Six Degreeing.
Also, his character's name is Paul. And I think Paul is Tim the way people thought Xander was Joss.
I bet he'll disagree, but you know I'm right about these things.
I liked the yellow stripe of "crime here" at the bottom, and for some reason the combination of electricity pole (is that hoe you call it in English? It's a word-for-word translation from Hebrew) and a tree on the back. And that it was asymmetric in the way the people were arranged.
That's right, Nilly.
And I think Paul is Tim the way people thought Xander was Joss.
I bet he'll disagree, but you know I'm right about these things.
Ooh. I can't wait. And I know waiting is a good thing, and I'm glad I have to wait if it will mean that the show is more supported. It just sucks for me personally.
Oh, and I think I'll have to go with Allyson on this one. I would guess that she would probably be right on these things, but more than that, I would really like it to be true. Not that I care if it's Paul or not, but that I would like to see TV:Tim.
Thanks, Allyson. Also, thanks for posting that picture.
I bet he'll disagree, but you know I'm right about these things.
Is it mean that I think tht I like it a lot when you disagree?
Is it mean that I think tht I like it a lot when you disagree?
HA! No, it's funny. I think. Why?
Why I like it? Because it makes for some interesting (and funny!) discussions. You both state your stand clearly and cleverly enough to make me go back and look and what I think and try to see if it stands against each of your arguments.
Um, in case I'm not all jet-lagged and can't do anything better than try to at least follow the discussion. With the help of Kristen's very expression-full face (which is a good thing, in case I'm not clear enough).
Of course, I'm the one who is not wrong!