How would you describe someone half Asian, half white?

for me, someone to whom it applies, I go with hapa or bi-racial or mixed.

Or half Asian, half black? Do you need a different word? Why?

Don't need a different word. again, for my world.

They prefer 'other.'

HATE other. HATE it a lot, primarily because it's so... well, yucky. "Oh, you can't conceive of what I am? I am other."

Thank god on the census you can just pick as many races as apply to you.

How would you describe someone half Asian, half white? Or half Asian, half black? Do you need a different word? Why?

I have a friend who's half white, a quarter black, and a quarter asian. She considers herself to be "Caublasian."

As I recall, the Census Bureau has the damnedest time trying to deal with race/ethnicity. It's important to quantify, because it can change congressional districting and federal funding, and like that, but incredibly hard. The census in 2000 was the first one with "mixed race" as a category, right? And I don't believe it asked you to break it down beyond that. (The Other box was still available.)

Over the years, they've tried all manner of ways to quantify Hispanics/Latinos/people of South and Central American heritage, as a category overlapping with race. If they said only "Hispanic", then people from Spain did check the box, but people from Brazil didn't. At one point in the late 70s, they used the term "South American", until they realized Anglo white people in Alabama were checking that box in all innocent error.

It's an ongoing conundrum.

Problem with the term black is that it's do damned catching, what with the one drop rule. So for many, if you can tell there's black blood -- the person's black. "Mixed" is held by some to be having airs. Except -- why? It's just true, right? But does it apply after four generations of mixing? I may be tri-racial by now. But black, still. Because my parents are black (enough), and theirs are also black (enough).

And then there are black people who won't admit to having any white blood, because the only way it could have gotten into their ancestry is by acts of possession and brutality. And therefore I shouldn't either.

The 2000 census actually left a blank you could fill in, at least in the form that I got. I remember, b/c I went ahead and listed all the countries anyone in my family tree was from, and DH wrote "Jewish Lithuanian".

That's gotta be hell to try to tabulate, though.

The "South American" thing reminds me of a friend who was collecting data over the telephone that included race. one of the options was "Native American". Almost everyone she talked to picked that one. She was surveying Pittsburgh. She very much doubted the accuracy of her results.

How would you describe someone half Asian, half white?

Often? Totally. Freakin. Hot.

I wonder how much of the (grossly offensive, mind you) erroticization of the tragic ~oons came out of the often hottitude of those who are mixed race.

Often? Totally. Freakin. Hot.

That would be my Japanese/Irish friend. If I had a nickle for every girl I've heard gush about how hot he is and every woman I've seen do a double-take when he walked by them I'd be set for life.

"mixed"

I have a friend who finds that very offensive. she says that you refer to dogs as "mixed". people are "bi-racial". *shrug* once again it comes down to what offends some people doesn't affect others.

Is it a mixed-breed thing to her, then?

It was suggested to me once that the word "race" should be replaced with "breed."

Accuracy aside, the idea of telling a bunch of people who'd been bred like livestock that they should start identifying with the word breed.

Good luck not getting beat up.

i'm not really sure. i would assume so though.